[ad_1]
In the first email dated January 18, 2011, Mahlangu told Gigaba: “I understand that Transnet may be about to reach an agreement. I will get the details of the agreement and inform you accordingly. I suggest that you socialize the president and his key assistants about the proposed agreement. “
In the second email sent on February 4, 2011, Mahlangu gave Gigaba options on how to deal with Gama’s reinstallation.
The investigation’s evidence leader, Anton Myburgh, said that when new emails surfaced, memory could be triggered to remember what happened.
Another situation would be that adopted by Mahlangu; that even after viewing the emails, he couldn’t remember the events noted in the emails.
Myburgh said Mahlangu’s initial statement, that at the time of Gama’s reinstatement, Mahlangu was still familiarizing himself with his new work environment, was incorrect when compared to the two emails.
Mahlangu agreed.
“In fact, what the emails show, even though I have no independent recollection, is that he has had a series of discussions with Mr. Mkhwanazi, who reported those discussions to his boss and had, in fact, given him some advice. “. Myburgh asked.
Mahlangu agreed.
[ad_2]
